Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
3 (
2
); 112-116
doi:
10.25259/ABMH_6_2025

Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia and Graded Modified Electro Convulsive Therapy

Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

*Corresponding author: Dr. Mona Srivastava, MD, Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. mona.srivastava1@bhu.ac.in

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Chauhan M, Mishra D, Srivastava M . Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia and Graded Modified Electro Convulsive Therapy. Acad Bull Ment Health. 2025;3:112-16. doi: 10.25259/ABMH_6_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

Schizophrenia, a debilitating psychiatric disorder, often presents with chronic and treatment- resistant symptoms. While anti-psychotic medications remain the mainstay of treatment, a subset of patients remains refractory. Reasons for treatment resistance are multiple, ranging from neurobiological anatomical to genetic, socio-familial, and personal factors, lifestyle, and pharmacodynamic factors.

Material and Methods:

A judicious mix of medication and graded modified electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is mostly helpful and helps in mitigating symptoms. Here we will describe 10 cases of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, which responded to a specific tailored approach. Medication and ECT were helpful in offering a reduction of symptoms.

Results:

All 10 cases were followed for 6 months, and it was seen that the patients who had received ECT during admission and who were on maintenance ECT showed a significant decrease in the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) score and improvement in their day-to-day functioning.

Conclusion:

A tailored-designed patient-specific protocol is desirable and effective.

Keywords

Clozapine
Electro-convulsive therapy (ECT)
KANE'S criteria
PANSS
Resistant Schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION

Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) is marked by the severity of existing symptoms, multiple relapses, hospitalizations, a deteriorating quality of life (QOL), and socio-occupational functioning.[13] The result is an increase in the burden of care in terms of economic and familial involvement and healthcare infrastructure.[4-9] Pharmacologically, the atypical antipsychotic clozapine has been the favored agent for TRS. Literature suggests that 40-70% of the patients do not respond to clozapine monotherapy.[6,7] Thus, alternative and cheaper options are a need for this subgroup. This subgroup of patients is the most severely affected.[8] Further clinical guidelines and operational definitions have been elaborated in recent consensus efforts.[10,11]

Objective

This study aims to present a case series of 10 patients diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia from a tertiary care center, evaluating the causes and factors behind the resistance and the role of maintenance modified electro convulsive therapy (mECT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 10 patients diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia, of which five underwent maintenance ECT, anti-psychotics, and long-acting depots over 6 months at our tertiary care center. Three more were put on anti-psychotics and long-acting depots. mECT was refused by attendants due to social stigma. Two patients were administered clozapine and first-generation anti-psychotics (as mECT was refused by family members and a depot was not affordable due to financial constraints). Clinical outcomes, including symptom severity, functional status, and adverse effects, were systematically evaluated using standardized assessment tools (positive and negative syndrome scale [PANSS]).[12]

Inclusion criteria

  1. Chronic treatment-resistant cases of schizophrenia (diagnosis by international classification of diseases (ICD)-10 and treatment resistance by modified KANE’S criteria)

  2. Age: 18-65 years of age

  3. The duration of treatment has been at least 2 years.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Presence of mood disorders, schizo-affective disorder, primary delusional disorder, or other psychotic disorder not meeting criteria for schizophrenia

  2. Medical, neurological conditions like epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, dementia

  3. Pregnancy or breastfeeding females

  4. Persistent non-adherence to previous treatment regimens

RESULT

Ten cases fulfilling the criteria for chronic resistant schizophrenia and assessment of clozapine resistance were also studied. The nature of symptoms was variable, including delusions of persecution, delusions of infidelity, and commanding hallucinations. This was interrupted by affective symptoms where the patient would be excited and develop familiarity [Table 1].[13]

Table 1: Clozapine resistance.
Adequate clozapine treatment
Dose 200-500 mg/dL
Blood levels >350 ng/mL
Treatment duration 2-3 months
Treatment adherence >80% of optimized doses for treatment duration
Non response <20% reduction in symptoms and lesser response in the level of functioning.

Summary of the role of dopamine and clozapine in schizophrenia treatment. Data adapted from Howes et al. (2017) and Kane & Correll (2016).

They had sought treatment from various psychiatrists without full remission of symptoms.

Patients 1 to 5 received mECT sessions and were put on maintenance mECT. They showed a significant reduction in the PANSS score from about 25-45% [Table 2].[14]

Table 2: Description of subjects
No. Age and gender Occupation Marital status Symptoms Duration of symptom Treatment received PANSS
1 29/ f Engineer Unmarried Hearing of voices
Delusion of persecution
Irrelevant talk
Muttering to self
Decreased sleep
Poor compliance to medications
9 yrs Tab Clozapine 600 mg OD
Syp Valproate 10 mL BD
Tab Lithium 400 mg BD
Tab Lurasidone 40 mg BD
Long acting depots
Inj olanzapine (300 mg) every 15 days
Inj flupentixol (40 mg) every week
Inj paloperidone 75 mg every month
ECT sessions : 8 in IPD
maintenance ECT every 15 days for 3 months then once monthly
At admission
74
At 3 month
56
At 6 month
42
2 45/f Housewife Married Delusion of persecution
Staring gaze
Gesturing in air
Muttering to self
Decreased sleep
11 yrs Tab Clozapine 150 mg OD
Tab Blonanserin 4mg BD
Tab Lithium 300 mg BD
Tab THP 2 mg BD
ECT sessions : 6 in IPD
Maintenance ECT
Every 3 months
At admission
66
At 3 month
48
At 6 month
34
3 28/f Stays at home Unmarried Delusion of persecution
Delusion of pregnancy
Hearing of voices
Muttering to self
Aggressive, abusive towards family members
6 yrs Tab cariprazine 1.5 mg
1-x-2
Tab lurasidone 40 mg
1-x-1
Tab lithium 400 mg BD
Tab oxcarabazepine
300 mg BD
Tab THP (2 mg)1-1-x
6 mECT session f/b
Maintenance ECT session every 1 month
At admission
78
At 3 month
64
At 6 month
50
4 55/F Housewife Married Delusion of persecution
Aggressive abusive
Muttering to self
Tb clozapine 200mg BD
Tb valproate (500) BD
Tb olanzapine 20 mg HS
Tb THP 4mg 1 OD
Was given 6 ECT session and was put on maintenance ECT every month
at admission
78
At 3 month
70
At 6 month
56
5 25/f Student Unmarried Delusion of control
Repeated sexual images
Increased talk
Over expenditure
Muttering to self
4 yrs Tab clozapine 200 mg BD
Tab divalproate (500) BD
Tab lithium (400) BD
Inj olanzapine 210 mg I/M
Every 2 weeks
Tab THP 2mg 1—1—x
Tab fluoxetine 40 mg OD
Patient had 3 ECTt session while admitted 6 months ago and was taken on maintenance mECT every 1 month
At admission
72
At 3 month
84
(after clozapine
Was removed
Due to side effects
At 6 months
44
6 46/M Doctor Married Delusion of persecution
Hearing of voices
Muttering to self
Fearfulness
Poor personal care
14 yrs Tb clozapine(100) 1--x--2
Tb lithium(400) BD
Tb lurasidone(40) 1 OD
Inj paliperidone 150 mg depot f/b 100 mg and 75 mg monthly
At 1 month
84
At 3 month
78
At 6 month
64
7 62/F Homemaker Married Hearing of voices
Decreased social interaction
Easy irritability
10 yr Tab clozapine 200 mg HS
Tab THP 2mg 2 OD
Inj paloperidone 75 mg monthly
At first day of
Contact
64
At 3 month
53
At 6 month
48
8 48/f Housewife Married Delusion of infidelity
Aggressive, abusive towards husband
Poor compliance to med
Decreased appetite
5 yrs. Tab clozapine 200 mg BD
Tab bupropion 150 mg BD
Tab lithium 300 mg BD
Tab THP 2 mg 1-1-x
Tab propranolol 40 mg 1/2OD
Injpaloperidone 75 mg every once month
At admission
58
At 3 month
52
At 6 month
44
9 39 /M Self
employed
Married Hearing of voices
Dec social interaction
Inappropriate smile
Dec sleep
10 yrs Tab clozapine 200 mg
1-x-2
Tab lithium 400 mg BD
Tab haloperidol 5 mg OD
Tab pacitane 4 mg OD
At the first day of
Contact
64
At 3 month
58
At 6 month
55
10 32/M Unemployed Unmarried Multiple bouts of laughter
Dec social interaction
Gesturing in air
Cognitive decline
5 yr Tab clozapine 250 mg OD
Tab haloperidol 1.5mg BD
Tab lithium 400 mg 1 HS
Tab fluoxetine 20 mg OD
At day of first
contact
76
At 3 month
72
At 6 month
68

OD: Once daily, BD: Twice daily, THP: Trihexyphenidyl (an anticholinergic drug used in extrapyramidal symptoms), PANSS: Positive and negative syndrome scale, ECT: Electro convulsive therapy, IPD: Inpatient department, MECTP: Modified electro convulsive therapy protocol, HS: At bedtime

Patients 6, 7, and 8 receiving long-acting injectable (LAI) paloperidone, along with clozapine, also showed a 20-30% reduction in the PANSS score, as compared to patients 9 and 10, whose reductions were less than 15%.

Patient (1) was treated by various doctors but was unresponsive. This patient was administered 600 mg clozapine augmented with two mood stabilizers, valproate and lithium. After eight ECT sessions, the patient showed nearly 70% improvement on symptoms and a 43.24% reduction of the PANSS score. She was then put on maintenance ECT regularly, at 15 days, then at one month; her PANSS score was 40 and below.

Augmentation with first- and second-generation antipsychotics

Addition of first-generation antipsychotics with clozapine in patients 9 and 10 showed insignificant improvement in the PANSS score.

Similarly, in patients 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, adding second-generation antipsychotics did not show much improvement in PANSS when assessed retrospectively. Subjective variation of patients due to recall bias can be considered.

Augmentation with mood stabilizers

Combining valproate and lithium in two of the patients helped in controlling the affective symptoms and increased libido and aggression in two of the females, while the patient only on lithium or valproate showed less improvement in overall functioning.

DISCUSSION

Determinants of schizophrenia are becoming resistant. Out of the 10 cases studied, who were taken in outpatient department (OPD) through convenience sampling, seven were females and three were males.

Females were more resistant to treatment as compared to males, with a larger number of females reported as chronic schziophrenia patients in our OPD, which is not in accordance with the usual data of females having a better prognosis

More chronic stressors, stigma in various regions, and lack of compliance due to dependency on family members can have led to the development of more chronicity in these females.

All 10 cases were followed for a period of 6 months, and it was seen that the patient who had received ECT during admission and who were on maintenance ECT showed a significant decrease in PANSS score and improvement in their day-today functioning [Table 3].

Table 3: Subject specific PANSS scores
Patient Percentage reduction in PANSS
1 43.24%
2 48.4%
3 35.89%
4 28.2%
5 38.8%
6 23.8%
7 25%
8 24.13%
9 14.06%
10 11.08%

PANSS: Positive and negative syndrome scale

Patients who received maintenance ECT every month, as compared to every three months, showed better control of symptoms and reduction in the PANSS score, both 1 month/3 month graded mECT patients were better as compared to patients plainly on clozapine.

Augmentation with mood stabilizers showed better improvement in controlling affective symptoms and aggression compared to clozapine alone.

Keeping the patients on once a fortnight injectable like LAI olanzapine paloperidone showed symptoms controlled at a baseline level and was effective in patients who had poor compliance with medications. The newer depot of paliperidone was tried in patients and proved to be effective in improving compliance. For chronic schizophrenic patients not showing any improvement in clozapine maintenance, ECT has proven to be the most effective way.

Preparing a module for maintenance ECT/graded ECT

For maintenance therapy, mECT may be administered every month or every three months, depending on the patient’s clinical condition and response to the treatment.

Treatment schedules can be individualized after assessing the patient’s symptoms, side effects, and overall progress before determining the appropriate frequency of mECT.

Education involving misconceptions about mECT should be given to patients so that more people with resistance can benefit from it.

Limitations

  1. The sample size was small (n=10), studies involving larger populations need to be done

  2. In these patients, economically viable versions like haloperidol deconate were not tried for the potential development of EPS. The probability of the safe 1st generation depot was likely to be lesser; hence, second-generation depots were tried.

  3. Limited follow-up period

  4. Ethical issues, including the potential risks of mECT (like cognitive side effects) in vulnerable populations, may be harder to address comprehensively in a small case series.

CONCLUSION

An individualized treatment plan combining graded mECT with suitable medications demonstrated effectiveness in managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Monthly maintenance ECT led to greater improvement in symptoms and PANSS scores. These findings underscore the value of personalized strategies in improving outcomes for this challenging patient group.

Authors’ contributions:

MC: Collected and curated the clinical data; MS: Provided the cases, supervised the clinical management, and guided the study design; DM: Drafted, structured, and edited the manuscript; all authors reviewed and approved the final version.

Ethical approval:

The research/study approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee at Banaras Hindu University, Institute of Medical Sciences, Ref:IMS/IEC/2025/7996, dated 25th June 2020.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , . Dopamine Synthesis Capacity in Patients with Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:1203-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Current Insights on the Pharmacogenomics of Antipsychotics. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2016;9:117-29.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Schizophrenia: An Integrated Sociodevelopmental-cognitive Model. Lancet. 2014;383:1677-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . The Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia: Version III-The Final Common Pathway. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2009;35:549-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Childhood Trauma, Psychosis and Schizophrenia: A Literature Review with Theoretical and Clinical Implications. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005;112:330-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia: Evidence-based Strategies. Mens Sana Monogr. 2012;10:20-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Adverse Effects of Antipsychotic Medications. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81:617-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Half a Century of Antipsychotics and Still a Central Role for Dopamine D2 Receptors. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003;27:1081-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Expressed Emotion and Psychiatric Relapse: A Meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:547-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia: Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis and Terminology. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174:216-29.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia. American Psychiatric Association. 2010;1:104-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia bulletin. 1987;13:261-76.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . The Role of Clozapine in Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:187-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . The Role of Genes, Stress, and Dopamine in the Development of Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81:9-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections