Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Meta Analysis
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Meta Analysis
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Meta Analysis
Original Article
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/ABMH_39_2025

Psychological Mechanisms of Self-Harming: A Comprehensive Review

Department of Clinical Psychology, Amity University Chhattisgarh, Manth (Kharora), Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

*Corresponding author: Premkant Damodhar Uparikar Department of Clinical Psychology Amity University Chhattisgarh State Highway-9, Manth (Kharora) Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. premkantmatrix@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Kirar S, Uparikar PD. Psychological Mechanisms of Self-Harming: A Comprehensive Review. Acad Bull Ment Health. doi: 10.25259/ABMH_39_2025

Abstract

Young people are more and more worried about their mental health when it comes to self-harm, especially non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The main goal of this narrative review is to look into the psychological processes that cause NSSI, focusing on cognitive, emotional, and interpersonal factors. Keywords like “self-harm,” “emotion regulation,” and “psychological mechanisms” were used to find relevant English-language studies published between January 2000 and June 2025 in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Findings show that people who hurt themselves often have trouble controlling their emotions, are hard on themselves, have problems with other people, and feel disconnected. These actions are unhealthy ways of dealing with negative feelings or regaining control. To make successful interventions, it is essential to understand how these things work. Therapies that are effective, such as Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT), and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), focus on these mental processes and can help individuals stop hurting themselves in the long run.

Keywords

Cognitive distortions
Interpersonal issues
On dysregulation
Rational emotive behavior therapy

INTRODUCTION

Self-harm, also known as non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), is a deliberate, non-lethal act of self-inflicted bodily harm. It is often linked to mental illnesses like borderline personality disorder, sadness, and anxiety.[1,2] This narrative review looks at 15 to 16 research works published after 2000 to find out how self-harm affects people's minds. We found relevant material by searching all of the databases, like PubMed and PsycINFO, with keywords like “psychological mechanisms of self-harm” and “psychological theories helpful in dealing with self-harm.” Even though self-harm was the main topic of the review, some of the studies also looked at different types of NSSI behaviors in both teens and adults.

Proposed protocols, single-case studies, and papers that were not published in English were excluded from this study. The articles are primarily about different topics that have to do with self-harm, such as controlling emotions, thinking processes, social factors, trauma, early problems, and neurological connections. Because of this, this report is organized into sections that reflect these categories. While some studies span multiple domains, most have focused on emotion regulation and interpersonal contributors to self-harm.

The psychological and physiological causes of self-harm are also looked at in this narrative using five different theories: cognitive-behavioral, emotion regulation, interpersonal, and rational emotive behavior therapy. Each part uses scholarly references to talk about why people hurt themselves and the steps that are taken to do so.

Definitions, symptoms, and prevalence

Self-harming behavior, or SBH, is when someone hurts themselves on purpose without intending to kill themselves. The people who self-harm may scratch, burn, cut, or hit themselves.[1,2] There are a few slightly different ways that psychological and medical books describe self-harm. One of the most popular guides, the DSM-5, calls this NSSI, with the focus that the harm is done on purpose and has nothing to do with suicide (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). There is another guide, ICD-11, that says self-harm is intentional harm done without the desire to kill oneself.[3]

In this narrative synthesis, self-harm is defined as hurting oneself on purpose without meaning to kill oneself. It is usually done as an unhealthy way to deal with mental pain.[4]

The goal of this review is to clearly explain the different views about self-harm, talk about why people might do it, and come up with ideas for more research. Understanding how these systems work helps create a more effective treatment and protection system.

Overview of existing theories

Below are several theories that explain why people engage in the self-harm process:

Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT)

REBT suggests that people hurt themselves not because of things that happen in their lives, but because of the irrational views they hold about those things.[5] Many people with these beliefs expect that others treat them fairly, say things like “I must not fail” or “It's awful if things don't go my way,” and aren't able to handle a lot of frustration ("I can't stand this pain"). People who hurt themselves may do so because they think that having strong feelings is too much to handle or because they think they need to punish themselves to get back in control.[6]

From the point of view of REBT, self-harm is a behavior that comes from having irrational beliefs that are triggered by events like feeling worthless or having unbearable mental pain, which leads to self-harming behavior.[7] Self-harm may briefly ease emotional pain, but it reinforces the irrational thoughts that are driving the behavior, keeping the cycle going. REBT helps people develop healthier emotional reactions and ways of coping by focusing on these irrational beliefs and promoting more sensible ones. Research further shows that integrating REBT with mindfulness enhances emotional regulation and cognitive flexibility, both of which are protective against self-harm.[6]

Cognitive-behavioral theory

Cognitive-behavioral theory (CBT) says that hurting yourself is a bad way to deal with problems because it is based on distorted thoughts and learned behaviors. People may hurt themselves because they have irrational beliefs like “I deserve to suffer” or “Pain is the only way to feel better.” These distortions often come from negative core beliefs about the self that are reinforced by trauma or environmental stresses.[7]

As a behavioral reaction to cognitive distortions, self-harm provides short-term relief from emotional pain through negative reinforcement. The action might stop ruminative thought processes or take your mind off bad thoughts. Over time, hurting yourself becomes a learned behavior that is encouraged by the fact that it relieves mental pain right away. Attentional biases toward pain and other cognitive processes keep the action going. The idea is that someone who hurts themselves as a way to deal with strong negative emotions like anger, sadness, or worry will feel temporarily better after doing it.[1]

Psychodynamic theory

According to psychodynamic theory, self-harm is a way of expressing unconscious conflicts or pain that hasn't been dealt with.[8] It could be a way of punishing yourself symbolically for feelings of guilt or shame that come from early attachment problems or stressful events. People with mental illnesses may hurt themselves to hide their inner psychological pain or as a way to protect themselves from deeper emotional wounds.[9]

Self-harm is a way for people to get rid of harmful emotions that they are not talking about, letting them show their anger or hate toward themselves. The act may also help the person keep their sense of self-cohesion when they have a problem like borderline personality disorder that causes their identity to be broken up. In a strange way, the physical pain may give people a sense of control or stability by bringing them back to their bodies.[9]

Emotion regulation theory

According to the Experiential Avoidance Model of emotion control theory, self-harm is a way to deal with feelings that are too strong or too intolerable.[10] People with mental disorders, like depression or PTSD, often have trouble controlling their emotions, which can make them hurt themselves as a way to escape or lessen their pain.

Self-harm sets off a chemical reaction that releases endorphins, which briefly ease emotional pain and make you feel happy or calm. This process makes people more likely to hurt themselves as a way to deal with stress because they learn that physical pain makes them feel better emotionally. This behavior turns into a habit when someone can't control their emotions, especially if they have borderline personality disorder.[11]

Interpersonal theory

Joiner and his colleagues' interpersonal theory focuses on the social purposes of self-harm, like telling others about your pain or getting their support.[12,13] When people feel alone, rejected, or unable to talk about their feelings, they may hurt themselves to show their pain or keep up relationships.[14]

Self-harm is a way to communicate without words; the injuries are obvious signs of the pain that someone is feeling inside. This could get moms to care for or pay attention to them, which would reinforce the behavior through social reinforcement. But the person's relationships can also make them hurt themselves more if they feel rejected or invalidated over and over again. This idea says that when people feel guilty, ashamed, or useless, they hurt themselves as a punishment. For themselves, far away to talk about how they feel about themselves negatively.[15]

Psychological mechanisms underlying self-harm

NSSI is caused by a lot of different psychological, mental, and social factors working together. Researchers from both clinical and community groups have found that self-harm serves both intrapersonal and interpersonal purposes, with distinct but overlapping mechanisms contributing to its onset and maintenance. Emotional dysregulation, interpersonal stress, trauma-related hyperarousal (e.g., nightmares), impulsivity and borderline personality disorder (BPD) traits, digital exposure, and body objectification are the six main mechanisms that have been found in empirical studies.

Emotion dysregulation

Emotion instability is one of the most well-established reasons why people hurt themselves. Teenagers and young adults who hurt themselves often say they have trouble recognizing, accepting, and sharing their feelings.[11] He discovered that teenage girls who were admitted for psychiatric care had a lot more emotional problems than their peers who were not in clinical settings. These teens were more likely to grow up in families and groups of friends that didn't support them, which made it harder for them to learn healthy ways to deal with problems. Without enough help, teens and young adults may use NSSI as a harmful way to deal with strong emotions like anger, shame, or sadness.[11]

Interpersonal conflict and social rejection

Another thing that makes people more likely to hurt themselves is social stress, especially being bullied or victimized by peers.Claes et al.[16], 2015 and Giletta et al.[14], 2015 both found that teens who were bullied and rejected by their peers were more likely to use NSSI, especially if they also had depressed symptoms. These studies support a transactional model that suggests rejection from others can lead to increased feelings of distress, potentially prompting individuals to harm themselves as a coping mechanism. Researchers also discovered that family disagreements not only made emotional problems worse but also led to conflict between peers. This suggests a broader breakdown in social support networks that makes unhealthy habits like NSSI more likely.[14]

Nightmares, hyperarousal, and negative affect

Emerging research also shows that trauma-related symptoms, especially nightmares, may be able to uniquely predict the risk of self-harm in ways that involve being overly alert and feeling bad all the time.[17] He showed that dreams could predict both suicidal and non-suicidal self-harm, even when depression was taken into account. There was a link between having nightmares and feeling more defeated, aroused, and stressed. The results of structural equation modeling showed that negative affect and self-harm-related cognitive cues helped explain the link between nightmares and recent self-harm. This supports the idea that dysregulation after sleep may make it harder to deal with problems and make people more likely to hurt themselves without thinking.[17]

Impulsivity, BPD features, and relapse risk

Personality flaws, especially traits of BPD and recklessness, have also been linked to NSSI that lasts and comes back. In a longitudinal study by Glenn and Klonsky, only a few factors—including past NSSI behavior, the probability of future NSSI, and borderline traits—were able to predict self-harm a year later.[1] Other traits that are often linked to engagement, like depression, anxiety, and drug abuse, did not predict future involvement. These results show that some people who have trouble controlling their emotions, chronic emotion regulation difficulties, and unstable self-image, like those with BPD Glenn et al.[18], 2011, may start hurting themselves on a regular basis. In a clinical sense, this shows how important it is to target relapse prevention, especially for people who have just stopped hurting themselves.

Digital exposure and social contagion

People who are more likely to experience NSSI are more likely to have exposure to self-harm imagery online, which can both reinforce and set off their symptoms. Susi et al.[19], 2023 did a systematic study and found that seeing images of self-harm on the internet and social media increased the desire to hurt oneself, made the behavior worse, and helped people form an identity around self-harm. Across studies, things like cognitive priming, social comparison, and group validation were seen to work. Although some studies found protective effects (e.g., increased help-seeking), the majority pointed toward a contagion effect, particularly among youth engaging with platforms that normalize or glorify self-injury.[19,20]

Body objectification and somatic dissociation

Body objectification—the tendency to view one’s body as an object or as something separate from one's life- is another way that people hurt themselves. Researchers discovered that people who didn't like their bodies and had trouble controlling their emotions were much more likely to hurt themselves.[21] It may be easier to hurt yourself mentally if you internalize cultural or family devaluation of the body. This is called somatic dissociation. People with eating problems also show these kinds of patterns, which suggests that the ways these people hurt themselves may be similar.[21]

Physiopsychological aspects of self-harm

The major psychological and physiological contributors to self-harm are summarized in Figure 1.[11,14,1,16-19] Self-harm is closely connected to both problems, controlling your emotions and problems with your body's response to stress. Researchers discovered that people with bipolar and depressive disorders who hurt themselves were more impulsive, had more trouble controlling their emotions, and did worse overall.[2] These mental traits, especially not being able to control your emotions, may make you more likely to hurt yourself.

Aetiology of self-harming.
Figure 1:
Aetiology of self-harming.

Researchers found that people who hurt themselves have less parasympathetic activity and less cortisol reactions to stress, which means that their autonomic nervous system and HPA axis are not working properly.[22] This shows that emotional weakness may work with a body that is less able to handle stress to make the risk of self-harm higher.

CONCLUSION

Theories like cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, emotion regulation, and interpersonal have helped us understand the complicated psychological processes that lead people with mental disorders to hurt themselves. Cognitive-behavioral theory focuses on thinking and acting in ways that aren't true, psychodynamic theory on conflicts that aren't aware, emotion regulation theory on controlling strong emotions, and interpersonal theory on communicating with others. To successfully deal with self-harm, these points of view come together to form therapeutic approaches like cognitive-behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, and psychodynamic interventions. Emotional dysregulation, interpersonal conflict, trauma-linked hyperarousal, psychological vulnerabilities, digital contagion, and body objectification can make someone hurt themselves. They work together in complicated ways. Problems controlling emotions seem to be a main factor that ties them all together. Other factors, like being more sensitive to stress after having nightmares or finding support in online communities, show how important it is to tailor evaluation and intervention. In the future, longitudinal plans that include these multidimensional factors will be needed to better understand how one event can cause another and come up with more complete treatment methods.

Authors’ contributions:

SK: Conceptualization, literature review, manuscript drafting and analysis; PDU: Supervision, manuscript review and editing, and final approval of the manuscript.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient's consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of Interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil

References

  1. . The functions of deliberate self-injury: a review of the evidence. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27:226-39.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Self-harm, affective traits, and psychosocial functioning in adults with depressive and bipolar disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017;205:896-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . International classification of diseases. . 11th revision (ICD-11). Geneva: World Health Organization; Available at: https://icd.who.int/en/ [Last accessed 2025 Jul 10]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Non suicidal self injury in adolescence. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19:20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . The effectiveness of rational emotive behavior therapy and mindfulness-based intervention on psychological, physiological, and executive functions as a proxy for sports performance. BMC Psychol. 2023;11:442.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. . Rational emotive behaviour therapy: theoretical developments London: Brunner Routledge; . Available at: https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203695579&type=googlepdf [Last accessed 2025 Jul 10]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . The rational management of self-harm risk: a cognitive-behavioural/problem-solving approach. . (3rd ed). New Zealand: New Zealand Association of Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy; Available from: [Last accessed 2025 Jul 10]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. . The developmental psychopathology of self-injurious behavior: compensatory regulation in posttraumatic adaptation. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004;24:35-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , . A psychodynamic approach to self harm in patients with a borderline personality disorder. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2010;52:321-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: the experiential avoidance model. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44:371-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Emotional dysregulation and interpersonal difficulties as risk factors for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescent girls. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011;39:389-400.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010;117:575-600.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Reasons for adolescent deliberate self-harm: a cry of pain and/or a cry for help? findings from the child and adolescent self-harm in Europe (CASE) study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatry Epidemiol. 2009;44:601-607.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Trajectories of suicide ideation and nonsuicidal self-injury among adolescents in mainland China: peer predictors, joint development, and risk for suicide attempts. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83:265-79.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Why do people hurt themselves? a new conceptual model of nonsuicidal self-injury. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6:428-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Bullying and victimization, depressive mood, and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: the moderating role of parental support. J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24:3363-71.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. . Exploring the psychological mechanism linking nightmares to increased self-harm risk. . Chester (UK): University of Chester; Available at: https://repository.nottingham.ac.uk/entities/publication/c597b2c9-28274e1a-8d15-b2b34878d372 [Last accessed 2025 Jul 10]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Prospective prediction of nonsuicidal self-injury: a 1-year longitudinal study in young adults. Behav Ther. 2011;42:751-762.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Viewing self-harm images on the avoidance model. Behav Res Ther. 2023;44:371-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. . Actions speak louder than words: an elaborated theoretical model of the social functions of self-injury and other harmful behaviors. Appl Prev Psychol. 2008;12:159-68.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Body regard, emotion regulation, and nonsuicidal self-injury. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2013;43:323-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , , , . Physiological stress reactivity and self-harm: a meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023;158:106406.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections